Silence is usually treated as a failure. A pause where language should have stepped in, a gap to be repaired. But sometimes silence does something far more active. It accumulates. It leans. It takes on a temperature. In Julia Elliott’s line from The Wilds, silence is not emptiness but a living space, one where something intimate and troubling is allowed to take root.
The unsettling power of the moment comes from how ordinary it sounds at first. Two people do not speak. Anyone who has shared a room thick with unaddressed feeling knows this terrain. What makes Elliott’s phrasing linger is the way that absence becomes fertile. What grows is described as beautiful and sweet, words we usually reserve for tenderness or care. Only afterward does the moral weight arrive. Evil, not in the theatrical sense, but in the quieter form that feels earned, even deserved. The danger is not imposed from outside. It blooms because both people let it.
That combination of attraction and harm runs through The Wilds, Elliott’s debut story collection, which was published in 2014 and quickly earned a reputation for its unsettling blend of Southern landscapes, bodily unease, and female interiority. Elliott, who grew up in South Carolina and later studied at the Iowa Writers Workshop, has spoken about her interest in desire that doesn’t behave itself. Her stories often take place in environments that feel lush and threatening at the same time. Forests, swamps, animals, weather. The human relationships inside them follow similar rules.
What feels especially sharp about this moment is how it captures a kind of collusion that doesn’t require speech. Silence becomes a shared language. It protects what should perhaps be questioned. It allows intimacy to form without accountability. There is pleasure in that. A sweetness. Anyone who has sat across from someone, aware of what should be said and choosing not to say it, knows the small rush of power that comes with restraint. The room seems to hum. The air feels denser. We once noticed the hum of a refrigerator growing louder in such a moment, as if the house itself had opinions.
Psychologically, this kind of silence can feel safer than honesty. Speaking would force definition. It would collapse ambiguity. It might demand action. By staying quiet, both parties get to linger in possibility. Elliott understands how seductive that can be, especially for women who are often trained to manage harmony rather than rupture it. Her work has been read alongside writers like Flannery O’Connor and Angela Carter, not because she imitates them, but because she shares their interest in moral discomfort and the strange beauty of transgression.
Culturally, this line resonates because it cuts against our insistence that communication solves everything. We are told to talk it out, name it, process it. And often that is right. But Elliott is attentive to the darker truth that silence can also be a bond. It can create an us against the world feeling. Think of relationships defined less by what is said than by what is mutually avoided. Families, workplaces, love affairs. The unspoken becomes a private myth.
There is also something distinctly Southern in this dynamic, though it is not limited to that region. Elliott has acknowledged the influence of Southern codes of politeness and repression, where not saying the thing is sometimes the thing itself. Silence becomes a form of etiquette. Or of control. Or of desire disguised as good manners.
What keeps the line from feeling melodramatic is its tenderness. The evil is not sharp or loud. It is sweet. That sweetness is what makes it dangerous. It suggests care without responsibility, closeness without clarity. It is the emotional equivalent of overripe fruit, fragrant and already tipping toward rot.
In a time when so much emphasis is placed on confession and exposure, Julia Elliott’s sentence offers a quieter warning. Not all harm announces itself. Some of it grows slowly in the dark, fed by mutual consent and the comfort of not having to explain ourselves. Silence, in her telling, is not neutral. It is a choice with consequences, even when it feels like refuge.
That may be why the line stays with readers. It recognizes something we would rather not name. That intimacy can deepen not only through honesty, but through shared avoidance. That what feels beautiful in the moment can later reveal its cost. And that sometimes the most consequential conversations are the ones we never have.
Fiona F. ~ 2026.
All rights reserved
No comments:
Post a Comment